| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | kattwoman (24)
04/22/2006 | worth watching at least once.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Drummond (54)
01/09/2006 | Mostly agree, assuming you're talking about the remake and not the rat pack version which was actually quite entertaining.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | daedalus (33)
01/08/2006 | Yes, the original was quite horrible and I don't think it was even terribly popular. The remake was far better.
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | GenghisTheHun (168)
08/27/2005 | Let's not confuse this turkey with the 1960's Rat Pack film. That was good--this stinks! This cast sleepwalks through this flick thinking their star reputations will save it--it doesn't work!
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | HelloKittyHell (47)
07/26/2005 | A cure for my insomnia.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | perfectsona (1)
05/20/2005 | i loved this movie !!!!!!!
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | bluetarbaby (8)
05/20/2005 | I can see how some might find this entertaining. But I don't like being patronized by studios. Star power alone will not get my approval. Probably would've been much better starring, John C Reily, Phillip Seymour Hoffman, etc etc etc. Of course we're talking about the modern one. I'm not the type to give a sh%t how much fun they had making it. Or perhaps I'm just a cynical, artsy fartsy idiot? Read between the lines, star power doesn't mean good. Was it actually good or did you convince yourself of that?
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | louiethe20th (74)
05/20/2005 | Come on man,this movie was really good.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Randyman (103)
05/19/2005 | Since you didn't specify, the five is for the original. Frank Sinatra and the Rat Pack did it right. The remake with George Clooney and Brad Pitt would get a three or less.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-9 OF 9 | View All |
