SuKingsANDKnig hts300 02/01/2009
We are all aware that, free masons are nothing more than just bunch of pagans with deluded lukewarm texture of humane morals. These theories are baseless, and we have been waiting for them to finish performing some of these surprises of miracles. This mixture of neolithic traditions, and modern thoughts of science in respect with the contemporary gerunds time-being are disconnected, discounted, disapproved, and remain as our imaginative spiritual reach-try to touch the loftiness of spiritualism world of blue void. I don't think that, defaulted technology and traditions can remain miscible, than to be naturally immiscible vying for different tendencies. We tried this before in our lives back then, and I tell you what, my Big uncles had their christians fame, and values hit the bottom sinking deep, right before our eyes like this; whether they liked it or not? Yet it happened practically with them wearing their civic belts like this manner. If you are wearing your fat civic belts..(if you are the head of the government)...for it. This is a pure science speaking here. Or surprise us please.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
Moosekarloff 12/19/2008
To begin with, the absurd notion of Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory whatsoever. It's just another retarded bit of nonsense propagated by so-called "Christian teachings," ridiculous mumbo-jumbo totally shrouded in delusional religious belief. And, as such, it is entirely based on that roll of toilet paper known as The Bible, both the Old Testicle and the New. Intelligent Design is not based on observable phenomena or empirical fact that leads to testable hypotheses, so, it's not a theory at all. It's a lame attempt by clueless religious weirdos to enfranchise their fairy tales in credibility. Of course, it cannot be proven, and can only be believed. So, it's dogma best suited for the gullible, weak of mind, childlike and those is serious denial.
lmorovan 10/31/2008
Intelligent Design is the acceptance and scientifically proven fact that the Universe and life could not have come into existence by chance, but by the action and purpose of a Being who is the author and Creator of all things. Even as it supports the account of Genesis regarding Creation, the proponents of Intelligent Design are not necessarily religious people or Christians. Objective and intellectually honest scientists are exploring Intelligent Design in order to make sense of all things that the evolution theory cannot explain in scientific terms. More and more prominent scientist of all disciplines are changing their subjective holding in the evolution theory and produce more and more evidence of intelligence and purpose behind the existence of all things.
Chalky Studebaker 10/31/2008
I thought "Intelligent Design" was a new bachelors degree from University of Phoenix
TeresaG 03/11/2008
Seriously? So many people in denial of this fact. For all those people on here who, first of all, said it is in contradiction to what we KNOW...how is that possible? What do we REALLY know? You throw science up in the air like it is total fact when, even as Canadasucks put it (in a different review) ~ that science is based on faith. It is said that over 500 people saw Jesus rise from the dead (documented) and some of you don't believe that. Yet, your willing to say that the earth was created by a big explosion (sorry, how many people saw that?). I just don't understand what so many people are afraid of. Why is it such a big deal to offer kids another explanation of how the world was created, and than let them choose? What irritates me is that people say that they are so open minded and free-spirited and take the "whatever floats your boat" approach to life ~ but on this issue, they take a FIRM stance against it. What gives? You can't be a "free-thinker" if you want to close out others' beliefs.
LadyJesusFan77 7 10/10/2007
The heighth of intellegence is the acceptance of creation. Nothing more or nothing less.
CanadaSucks of NeverLand Ranch! 11/07/2006
Politically-correct speech for creationism. . .which simply does not stand up to increasing scientific knowledge. . .reveals deliberate ignorance held by its practitioners and supporters. . .
Flick01 11/07/2006
In my view, there is too much order within the universe for this to be the result of a random accident. The way the things of nature interact with each other such as the insects, the plants, and the animals, is just too perfect to be the result of a chaotic origin. The same can be said of the plants and creatures of the oceans. Everything has a purpose. I just find it difficult to believe that all of this order happened by chance. (It's also difficult to understand how something living could come from something non living) For this to be the result of a random accident would be like parking a Sherwin-Williams paint truck next to a white wall, then taking a hand grenade and blowing up the truck. The explosion creates the Mona Lisa on the wall. Possible? Yes. Likely? No.
magellan 11/07/2006
I think it's a creative attempt to insert religion into science class. But the fact that it was developed by a lawyer - and not a scientist - would seem to disqualify it from being treated as science. Or am I missing something?
numbah16tdhaha 11/07/2006
Psst... its a compromise to try to rationalize what we know now with what we were told before and it doesn't really work.
blue47 11/07/2006
ID is neither a theory nor Intelligent
SharonParry 11/06/2006
I think so. The opposition seems to believe we started out as a cell thrashing around in the water and then became monkeys and all of a sudden we stopped evolving. For what reason we stopped and when... they can never tell us the theory for that. I'd definitely call creation " Intelligent Design ".
DarrenGJohnson 05/05/2006
The Bible does teach that God has created the World and specifically that Jesus is the creator of the world. If this is true then life has a purpose (this is the Forest Gump theme), but if not then we are certainly just going through life floating along like a feather with no particular function or purpose, but to finally die and that is it. Anybody who claims to believe the Bible and does not believe in creation needs to qualify their claim by saying that they just believe in the parts that suit them.
13 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated