| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | gollygwiz (0)
01/21/2006 | Definately a child toucher....sicko. But you know, you also have to blame the parents for sending their kids to a grown man's house for a sleepover. Really, either the parents are idiots or they were looking for money (lawsuits).
(0 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | ProgrammerRingo (18)
10/25/2005 | I'm pretty sure that Jackson's guilty as homemade sin. I mean, when you're a fortysomething with all this elaborate kids stuff, and you let kids sleep in the same bed with you (and we're not talking about something inocuous like a parent sleeping with their child), what do you think we're talking about?
Jackson's fans are so ready to kneejerk and say, "Oh, he's innocent!" even though there is a lot of evidence of the contrary. Just because he's a famous musician doesn't mean that he isn't a pedophile.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | angry girl (2)
06/19/2005 | I don't know and I don't care either. I know some people think he's God's gift to humanity (stupid people) and some think he's a crazy pedophile. Believe what you want, but this is over with and there are much more interesting things going on in the world.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| ClassicTVFan47 (37)
06/17/2005 | I have no doubt that he was guilty. While some of my friends celebrated, I commented, I know a villain when I see one. I have a feeling that all of the witnesses were paid off by Jackson and his crack team of attorneys or too frightened to commment. I mean--when he openly says he sleeps with young boys, shouldn't that make alert klaxons scream?
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (83)
06/16/2005 | I feel that he is. Though I admit I cant avoid being more than a little influenced in my thinking by his personal weirdness and past bizzaro behavior. Its not that I previously had anything against him and want to think of him as a pervert; its just that hes doing such a brilliant job of looking like a really scary individual. Even the circumstantial evidence, as a whole, seems to point straight at him. Still, I see how the jury would have reasonable doubt in the absence of any completely damning physical evidence.
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | TJGypsy2 (7)
06/15/2005 | I think the jury said it best on this one. They said that they think that he may have molested a child or children at some point, but that there wasn't enough evidence in this case to convict him. That pretty much sums up how I've felt about the case since it started.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Bird808 (53)
06/15/2005 | I find it so amusing, contradictory and almost a shame when I see people making judgemental comments on someone they don't even know, or think they know. I don't know if Michael Jackson is guilty and quite frankly I don't care as he only knows what REALLY happened and if he lied, well lets just say that in this world no-one is an immortal.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | souljunkie (20)
06/15/2005 | Absolutely.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jar-Jar Binks (16)
06/14/2005 | The jury has spoken. He was innocent on all counts, therefore, you should think of him as an innocent victim. You reviewers haven't even been to Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch, so you don't know what he does in his personal life.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Redoedo (40)
06/14/2005 | Was this every really a question?
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | numbah16tdhaha (151)
06/14/2005 | I know in my heart that he diddled children and he should burn for it.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Randyman (104)
06/14/2005 | Guilty as charged!
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | texasyankee (21)
06/14/2005 | Always will.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-13 OF 13 | View All |
