| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | abichara (63)
06/17/2005 | Yes, the mother was probably out for money and she tried to have Michael Jackson entrapped, for they knew that he was a child molestor. Why would any mother send their kids to be with MJ when they know that he is a child molestor, which he is depite this courts verdict.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (85)
06/16/2005 | Whatever Jackson did or did not do, it doesn't change the fact that this woman is an opportunistic imbecile of the first measure. She was obvious, ridiculous and perfectly capable of losing the case almost single handedly. Personally, I think she should have been brought up on charges of child neglect and abuse.
(8 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jar-Jar Binks (17)
06/15/2005 | Got that right. Taking advantage of a celebrity is wrong. It's not only the mom's fault, but it is the fault of the boy for visiting Michael in the first place. The boy and mother should be jailed for starting it.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | minkey (40)
06/15/2005 | It certainly appears that this was the case, considering her past rampage on other celebrities. This, and the fact that the jury questioned why any adult would willingly leave their child alone with Michael Jackson, caused him to be acquitted. The case however was about whether or not Michael molested the child - the mother's motives should not have influenced the jury.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | souljunkie (21)
06/15/2005 | Yep. She made this case hard to win in my estimation. But the boy was violated anyway. I believe if the prosecution had built there case on the molestation and not all the conspiracy crap Michael would be getting put away right now. I believe Michael will strike again. That is the real sad thing. He is a petafile. That will not change because of the verdict.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | James76255 (26)
06/15/2005 | I think this is a given. It has nothing to do with Jackson's guilt or innocence, I just think this woman would try to squeeze a nickle out of any situation she finds herself in.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Redoedo (41)
06/14/2005 | No doubt here. I don't doubt Michael Jackson's guilt, but given his history, what responsible parent in their right mind would send their kids to hang out with him?
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | texasyankee (22)
06/14/2005 | That's right, Goneway. And yes I think there should be a civil suit from the child to the mother, for ruining the case.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Randyman (109)
06/14/2005 | Why aren't any of the parents being arrested for child andangerment?
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | louiethe20th (78)
06/14/2005 | Another big understatement!How many times has she tried to sue for loot?
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-10 OF 10 | View All |
