| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | lmorovan (12)
07/09/2008 | Unless, of course, you are unhappy with the low acceptance of a brilliant review and are ignored by the others. Pumping the ego may actually work. Sometimes :) If you don't believe me, check numbah, fitman, automatt and dynasword, just to name a few.
(0 voted this helpful, 3 funny and 1 agree) |
 | frogio (47)
05/16/2008 | 5/16/2008: This is starting to get real tiring, people. Hasn't it become clearly evident by now that the only reason I persist on this site is to retain this stupid standing. Can't you all just provide a pathetic frog this one, simple triumph. Geeeeze...
Today, 6/8/2007: Ha ha! I'm still on top of the list!! (and you didn't believe me)
Original comment date, 11/17/2005: Ha ha!! I'm on top of the list! And if anybody comments I'll change it to "Ha ha!! I'm still on top of the list!"
(8 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Molfan (57)
04/30/2008 | I have done this on occasion. maybe I made this comment a couple years ago { I have been here about six years} and the subject has come up again. now there are new people here so re-post so they can read. or do not like what I said and change the comment. Might have made some errors change that. not so I can be at the top of the list. beats writing a brand new one if I do not want to.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Gentle Jude (23)
08/08/2005 | This doesn't mean you've been on RIA too much, it could either mean you have a very strong opinion about something and you want more people to read it, or you have made a spelling mistake or some form of mistake and you want to correct it. I give this a 4 because Ive done this myself on many occasions.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Mad Hatter (37)
07/13/2005 | And your point being what?
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | texasyankee (21)
07/11/2005 | Not to intentionally put it back to the top. There's been times when I go to a list I've been to a long time ago and I can't remember what it is that I've posted, so I open my response and a couple of times instead of hitting cancel, I've hit enter.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | irishgit (137)
07/11/2005 | Guilty. Sort of. So?
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jed1000 (72)
07/11/2005 | Judging by the responses up to this point it would seem that this practice has less to do with the amount of time someone has spent at RIA and more to do with either A> Wanting to correct errors, or B> wanting more reaction to a given comment. I'm in the first group myself.
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | kamylienne (77)
07/10/2005 | Well, if I could change it without putting it back on the recent comments list, then I would, but that's not how it works. But, if I find that I've made a serious typo, then yeah, I'd change it.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Mr.Political (18)
07/10/2005 | Usually I only return to an old review when I've noticed a factual, grammatical or spelling error. From time to time if a posting of mine gets buried on a topic I care about then I may re-submit it but the helpful count has usually collected as many helpfuls as it would have by then...
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Randyman (103)
07/10/2005 | I do this all the time. When I see a mispelled word, or my sentence structure is out of syntax, I want to correct it. I don't know how to type. I use the hunt and peck system, but I'm fairly quick, all things cinsidered. But sometimes I do hit the wrong keys. So when I do this, it has nothing to do with having my comment go back to the top of the list.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Inmyopinion (10)
07/10/2005 | Guilty. I've done this several times.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-12 OF 12 | View All |
