| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | lmorovan (18)
04/17/2008 | If we don't defend the right of Americans to be born, soon we will have no America.
(2 voted this helpful, 4 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Automatt (43)
03/17/2008 | For about a decade the fringe element in this group was the largest home-grown domestic terrorist threat to the United States.
(5 voted this helpful, 4 funny and 1 agree) |
 | blue47 (13)
10/22/2007 | Yes, blow up a clinic for jesus
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | louiethe20th (78)
01/25/2007 | These people that try to protect innocent lives need to be stopped asap. These worthless and defenseless babies should be wiped out immediately!
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | twansalem (41)
06/24/2006 | Protecting human life poses no danger to this country.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Redoedo (41)
06/24/2006 | Views on both sides of this issue are held by most with great conviction, and therefore it is highly ignorant to refer to either as "dangerous" to America. People standing up for those views that they hold most strongly is what American democracy is and should be about.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | AshleyAnne56 (8)
06/23/2006 | I am not Pro-life, but Pro-choice. But, I do believe that they have the right to their beliefs. But not to force it on the rest of the country. If you are Pro-life, don't have an abortion,simple as that, and let everyone else do as they see fit, and suffer any consequences that there may or may not be in this life or the next.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zuchinibut (41)
06/23/2006 | I think the Pro-Life movement is good for the US. It is an example of a group of people with a minority opinion, who are able to voice their concerns freely. This movement is about protecting life, and not about holding women back. I know it may be unpopular with many people, but to say that it is dangerous is laughable.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Donovan (137)
06/23/2006 | Pro = being for something
Life = not dead
Being for keeping someone alive? Ummmm, sounds like a no-brainer to me.
Should people kill to make a point of being "pro-life"? NO!!! That is NOT pro-life; that is pro-death and is murder.
As far as rights with "your body"? You do have those rights, but the baby's body is NOT your body!
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | kissmeback (5)
06/19/2006 | keep and eye on
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | DarrenGJohnson (20)
05/10/2006 |  There are dangerous elements in the movement of course. The problem when battling evil is that you cannot use the same weapons as the evil that you are opposing or else you become more evil than they are. This is true of abortion clinic bombers. They are evil, because they use the same methods of death that they are opposing. Evil can only breed evil and violence can only breed and until we learn this evil will win. Abortion rights people have to dehumanize the baby and call it a fetus in order to justify in their minds that abortion is okay. The person who bombs the abortion clinic has to dehumanize all of the people that are going to be killed in the bombing in order to justify in his mind that it is okay to do this horrible act. I am pro-life, but am unwilling to use violence or any type of death measures like putting mothers on trial for murder. I believe that abortion is wrong and it dehumanizes all involved in its practice, but I believe these people need to be restored and not bombed.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | CanadaSucks (50)
12/20/2005 | Domestic terrorists. There is no life without choice or freedom. . .sorry that scares you, kids. . .
(7 voted this helpful, 1 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Drummond (60)
12/20/2005 | The fringe of this group probably accounts for 9 out of 10 of the domestic terrorist acts over the past couple of decades. But we're afraid to call them terrorists.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Djahuti (57)
12/20/2005 | More of a distraction than a danger,except for the ones willing to shoot doctors and bomb clinics because "Life is Sacred".It is interesting to note that so many of the people who count an embryo as a human being are fine with the fact that thousands of people were roasted alive,reduced to pulp or dismembered when we bombed Baghdad for erroneous and false reasons.Go figure...
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CastleBee (85)
11/14/2005 | Useless babies? Is that anything like useless toddlers, children, adults, or seniors? An argument could be made that we are all useless in some way. And one could just as easily be made that we ALL have value. If you think babies are useless then, feel free to have yourself spayed/neutered, try birth control or give abstinence a shot - it CAN be done. But then that would limit those precious freedoms...and we wouldn't dare want to do that - even at the expense of possibly snuffing out another life.
(11 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Tornado8 (0)
11/13/2005 | The pro population explosion that will destroy us all, all for the sake of useless babies when we already have enough people? Ya, they're a threat to the whole world.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | trebon1038 (65)
10/27/2005 | I have no intention to go get an abortion but without the choice desperate women end up bleeding to death or dying from infection due to the hackers. Most clinics now have waiting periods and education programs to make people realize that abortion is not birth control.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| nataila (0)
10/03/2005 | The only dangerous ones are abortion clinic bombers--the hypocrites. I wouldn't say the rest of these people are dangerous to America in the long run, they have a right to their opinions even if they differ from mine.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | numbah16tdhaha (156)
09/06/2005 | That calling life what it is and abortion is murder concept are just too dangerous! UPDATE: They are apparently unhelpful, too. (numbah sticks his tongue out)
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | X Factor Z (15)
09/06/2005 | They are totally agaianst all types of human sexuality and freedom, they actually do not care about human life.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | spartacus007 (10)
09/05/2005 | The only danger from them is fringe terrorist element.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Mr.Political (20)
09/04/2005 |  Obsolete? The pro-abortion movement (note that I don't call it anti-life) has been telling itself that pro-lifers are becoming extinct and non-existent for the past what...thirty five years? In the past ten presidential elections, Republicans have won seven times...pro-life presidents mind you. In 2003, President George Bush signed into law the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act placing restrictions on abortion for the first time since Roe v. Wade. A recent study of the most recent generation (Generation Y) shows that they do in fact support restrictions on abortion and don't feel it's necessary to have on-demand. History books are being opened up and Americans are learning that the original woman's rights activists were actually against abortion because they saw it hurt women. Biology books are being opened up revealing that a fetus doesn't look like just a bunch of cells at six, seven, or eight weeks. But that's okay. Hollywood keeps funding NARAL and the pro-abortionists think they've won. More and more people are rejecting the transparent radicalism behind traderboy and other pro-choicers and they won't be so smug much longer...
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | traderboy (26)
09/04/2005 | Dangerous to previous generations, but becoming increasingly obsolete as their footholds of fear, violence, and ignorance give way to the overpowering will of the better-informed individual. The anti-choice movement has one of the most irrational, hypocritical, and checkered pasts of all time (which is no small boast). Is it any wonder why the world sniffs out their dubious muckrakings and slaps them back into their antiquated monastics? To the betterment of society, zealotry is the slow-witted mule that's being tilled and harvested by the machinery of change.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-23 OF 23 | View All |
