| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | Wavebacker (25)
08/21/2005 | They ( both Pro and Anti) Abortion protesters should be forced to work with babies born to crack addict mothers and babies born with AIDS.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | CanadaSucks (45)
08/21/2005 | Bad idea. How about sentencing them to graduate school instead?
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Solenoid DH (19)
08/21/2005 | The America I grew up in has allowed people the right to dissent what they perceive to be injustices. Why make it a crime now to be a pro-life activist? We've allowed all kinds of demonstrations over the years for other causes.
(7 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | traderboy (25)
08/21/2005 | An emphatic NO. The anti-choice brigade is actively attempting to wedge their noses into public schools and dismantle it for their own theocratic purposes; this proposal would have them salivating and straining at their leashes. People twist and contort experiences to suit their mantras and ideologies. Abortion protesters should be treated as they currently are: if they're peaceable enough, they're no problem; the rowdier and nastier they get, the harsher the penalties should get.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Sundiszno (30)
08/21/2005 | Even after reading SZinhonshu's post on this item, I'm not sure just where this question is supposed to be going. I think it is that after spending time in the public school system, convicted abortion protesters would realize that abortion is necessary because young people don't know enough to keep from getting pregnant in the first place. I'd look at this item a bit differently - requiring convicted abortion protesters to act as aides in public scholls might well enable them (much to the dismay of so-called pro-choice advocates) to proseletize kids about what they (the protesters) consider to be the evils of abortion. This could be a two-edged surgical scalpel if it were implemented as a punishment for abortion protesters.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | SZinHonshu (44)
08/20/2005 |  The debate between persons who represent Pro-Choice and Pro-Life perspectives did not start when Roe v. Wade was passed and will not end if Roe v. Wade is overturned. Advances in science and medicine that increase the period of time that a fetus is viable outside a mother's womb will not terminate this argument. Historical research of the Federal Constitution and delving into poverty statistics will be equally ineffective for the purposes of removing the bone of contention between the parties who feel so passionately on both sides.
Persons who are convicted of illegally blocking/harassing abortion clinics and their employees should be sentenced to community service wherein they must act as Teacher Assistants at public elementary schools and trade schools in medium and large American cities for a period of 4 to 6 months. This would end the argument.
No person of average intelligence who invests a few months in such an endeavor would again be able to argue that the immorality of taking an embryonic human life is as great as the immorality of people reproducing who are unfit to be parents.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-6 OF 6 | View All |
