I love how Hillary is on so many lists. I can keep referring to her as the disgusting anti-christ all day long. She needs a food trough.

I am not sure she is polarizing.Even her base is not wacky for her.I was at a dinner.3liberals torched her.'Nuff said.

Hillary certainly is a polarizer - most people either hate her or love her, and I believe that many of those feelings are based on emotion or gut instint rather than cold logic. She is a shrewd woman, no doubt about it, and a glib talker (and I rate those as pluses), but I also think she's calculating, power-hungry, and self-serving. Not my very favorite person.

Abichara nailed it. Hilary Clinton is very polarizing for what she represents - a left leaning woman who is a product of the Women's Rights movements who actually has power and clout. She's someone who could really shake up the status quo in America and have us all take a hard look at what type of country we really are.

Very highly polarizing not for the policies and causes that she espouses necessarily, but rather for what she represents. Hillary seems to be a symbol for all the 1960's leftists that hold her up as something of a symbol. Even though she really isn't at all that radical, her persona comes across as rather shrill--that doesn't endear her to some elements, especially to those on the right.

Like Jeff Foxworthy says,If you don't have anything nice to say you are probably talking about Hillary Clinton.

An intelligent woman should not be so threatening, but it is obvious she is perceived as a threat by many. So yes, she is polarizing.

idolized by the liberals, torched by the conservatives, most people don't have lukewarm opinions about the former first lady. many people think she will be the next president, but i don't even see her winning her party's nomination. she doesn't have one tenth of her husband's charisma, and her speaking voice sounds like nails on a blackboard.

Get ready for the four year run to the presidency. She now heads to the middle of the road, abandoning many liberal causes and constituencies in favor of a moderate senate voting record, especially after this presidential election. Demo's will have to choose between her and Edwards, as Pres/VP, but since she's older, she gets the pres title. Mark it down: Hillary for President on '08. Did someone leave a window open? UPDATE: My good friend, GoneAway, don't sell the farm, it's a long road to have no turns in it for Hillary. If you want to see the right wing mobilized for the mother of all campaign battles wait until Hill tosses her broom into the race. Sorry, I mean her hat. Even the moderate liberals cringe (and shiver) at the thought. She could have delivered the feminists for Kerry, but he opted for a pretty face with no experience, from a southern state. Too late now, though. They'll certainly take New York, California and Massachusetts, everything else is in play.

All you conservatives assume Kerry will lose in November and that Hillary will run in 2008. You know what they say about people who assume. At any rate, If she and Edwards were to run for the democratic nomination I would want Edwards to win. Unless all you conservatives who swear to move to another country actually do so. Than it just might worth it for Hillary to win.