Really?

Prove it.

Come on show me a catalogue.

No come on, really. I mean it, show me...

been in the store lately? half naked guys on the wall doesnt exactly show anything about the chloths. not ot mention the cloths quality sucks for being overpriced, maybe if they were made in america by wage workers rather then in indonesia by child wage slaves thay would be of better quality, ive had shirts that i have bought there when i thought it was good stuff, these shirts lasted maybe a month, then, when the new line came out, coincidentially the shirts started to tear, is that the quality iwanted for 50 dollars for a polo shirt? i think not

"Too" pornographic? So what would be better? "Somewhat" pornographic? "Slightly" pornographic? Actually the photos in their catalogues are no worse than some of the Calvin Klein (and others) ads I've seen on giant billboards in NYC and Boston. And those are right out in public.

Maybe they bordered on tasteless in the past, but apparently most of the complaints are about bare-chested male models. Word is they have changed their approach in recent years. Viewing theit online site shows no pornography at all.