probably the newpaper first. We get it every morning. I do not read every article. then the tV news next we watch is some in the morning and local for the most part at 6pm. we have Time magazine and read some of the articles but not front to back. i can only listen to so much bad news and it seems that is what is always being reported. I know there is a lot a rotten stuff going on i just don't always want to hear it. we have gone through some of our own "bad news" such as job loss, fear of losing home, wondering how we will pay our bills. it gets too much to always hear the bad going on. I do listen and read the news. papers have good information and local and national news gives us the in about what is going on in the world. all three can be of help.

I'm a written word kind of guy, so its newspapers and periodicals, with online "news" (not blogs), followed by the electronic media.

news.bbc.co.uk, news.google.com, www.spiegel.de, NPR on the radio. Never signed up for TV service providers, so we have one, but only use it to watch DVDs.

Internet - Drudge report
Cable - Fox News
Radio - El Rushbo, Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill Cunningham and Jerry Doyle

For the most part, I would have to say TV news.

It's all the same thing! TV gives you a visual, internet news sources repeat what's being said on TV, and newspapers are becoming an anachronism, as most major outlets are now on-line, many of them are freely available to the public. News is news! Now if you want to go for analysis, all three offer options. Newspapers and periodicals tend to offer less shallow coverage than TV, which relies too much on visuals to make their point, thus losing the substantive quality of what's being said. I don't know what it is, but when I read, I tend to engage a subject more than if I watch it on TV.

I don't think it makes a big difference. As long as I receive news, I am ok with it.

Depends on how much you want to know. If you want the basics with frills , choose TV. Want the a liitle more than the basics with pictures, choose the Internet. Want to really know what's going on in-depth - read about in in the newspaper and magazines like Time, Newsweek and US News and World Report. I would choose periodicals over the other two.

The internet, for blogs that agree with my political ideology; HappyNews.com with it's fun-to-print only rule and the ability to post your own news with commentary on your own blog.

VERY tough choice; Newspapers/other printed sources tend to be a little more accurate (not always, but slightly more so) than the other two choices, but it takes time to print. Television, though almost instantaneous, has severe credibility flaws when they try to sensationalize stories and assume too much information before checking facts. The internet provides accesibility to many more sources, so you can double check sources (if you know where to look), but any idiot with access to the internet can post crap and call it "news". With all this in mind, I'll go with printed sources such as newspapers, with the criteria that I'd have to go with very specific sources, and keeping in mind that all things printed aren't necessarily true.

I like the Internet for the variety and its accessibility.

TV for sure. Have you seen all those female co-anchors lately? They might be full of it, but so are their shirts.

Periodicals, call me old-fashioned if you will, followed by internet, and then tv.

internet (it would suck but I would survive)

Television, it will always be the most current news.