irishgit 05/26/2008
In their respective primes? Favre. Today? McNabb.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
abichara 11/18/2006
Today? McNabb, as he's clearly in his prime. But when you compare the two at their prime, I'd go with Favre. He's much more explosive and can make big plays. But to fair to him, today he's in a team that really lacks talent, especially on defense. Put him on a team with a solid defense, Baltimore, San Diego or Miami, and he still would play very well.
PzKpfw VI E 12/29/2005
Favre today, or Farve 5 years ago? Farve 5 years ago, McNabb today.
MariusQelDroma 12/29/2005
Favre. I'm an adopted cheesehead (10 years plus).
numbah16tdhaha 12/23/2005
I'll go McNabb just to piss off TO.
Wavebacker 12/22/2005
Farve is a shell of what he once was. It's worse now that he's on a bad team. McNabb is reaching his prime. Give McNabb good players and he'll thrive. Even with poor talent, McNabb can have success. If McNabb were the Packers QB now, he'd have done better than what Farve has done with GB.
6 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated
