 | GenghisTheHun (181)
02/13/2008 | I give you the review of Nimrod in grizzspeak.
nimrod wuz a mytee hunter he stuk a can of grizz in wun cheek and tuk a club and chilled lotz of animuls itz a gud thing ther waz lotz of animulz arownd since nimrod waz so gud god got mad and drownd evrbudy xcept noah n his kids all the animals were screwed by hillary clinton's account we r going to luz our grizz
(1 voted this helpful, 1 funny and 0 agree) |
 | RichardMarshal (8)
01/19/2008 | Nimrod was the Israelite name for Gilgamesh, King of what came to be Babylon, as well he ruled over other lands. We was known as a mighty hunter of God, therefore, he could not be evil. He was rebellious, but not against God. If anyone knows the Epic of Gilgamesh they would known who and what Nimrod rebelled against (many forces, including mortal life & death). There many false tales, traditions and conceptions about Nimrod, any that conflict with the ideas presented in the Tanakh must be false (one of them being, of course, that he was in any way evil). Therefore anything that proclams Nimrod to be evil does not come by way of the Spirit of the Lord.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 1 agree) |
 | HistoryFan (102)
02/12/2006 | Some people say that Nimrod was a Biblical hero, however, that might be a misconception because some sources say that Nimrod was a rebel against God.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
