Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register

Possession of pornography

Listed in:  
Item added by Drummond. Added on 02/19/2006
RSS Icon

10 Reviews

Djahuti
02/21/2006

Possession of pornography 1

Hey,for some sickos,even a Lexus catalog is porno.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

oscargamblesfr o
02/21/2006

Possession of pornography 1

Maybe a big deal in 1954, but not anymore. If you ARE gonna get busted for this, why get busted for more or less 'mundane' porn, like regular sex or something conventional? If I was gonna get busted for something as routine and ho- hum as this, I'D hope it was for something really way out there and noteworthy enough to get you in the paper and have everyone say you're nuts, like Bea Arthur in an itty bitty thong going at it with Della Reese in S&m GEAR... (all right that was a joke people, I'm as mortified at thinking about that as you are)

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 1 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Randyman
02/21/2006

Possession of pornography 1

As long as it's not child porn, it's no big deal, and no one's business.

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

numbah16tdhaha
02/21/2006

Possession of pornography 1

Its only illegal if you have some underage people in it. Who thought this up?

Join to vote! 6 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

operator 409
02/21/2006

Possession of pornography 2

If it is legal to manufacture, I guess you can't logically criminalize the ownership of it.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

CanadaSucks
02/20/2006

Possession of pornography 1

Might as well lock me up you Puritans. . .

Join to vote! 5 Helpful / 1 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

Drummond
02/20/2006

Possession of pornography 1

Except for child porn, these laws are pretty much history - killed by an ACLU enhanced First Amendment, for better or worse. Judges and legislators had attempted to fashion legal standards to define porn, such as "material of a prurient interest calculated to provoke sexual reaction and lacking in redeeming cultural, historical, scientific, and educational characteristics." So basically, the civil libertarians asked, are we saying that well written porn is acceptable, but badly written porn illegal?" Problem is, badly written porn has an educational value - as in "don't do this." Justice Hugo Black was probably the last Supreme Court justice to attempt to fashion a workable standard. He basically said, "I'll know it when I see it." Unfortunately, he's no longer around to point it out to us.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

souljunkie
02/20/2006

Possession of pornography 2

Unless it is child pornography, again, it is very hard to regulate these things that dont harm anyone but those involved. Its like outlawing smoking, or drinking. And we have not found the reasons to outlaw either of those yet thank God.

Join to vote! 3 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

frogio
02/20/2006

Possession of pornography 3

Oh well, there goes my select cache of National Geographic magazines. Gotta get a new hobby, anyway.

Join to vote! 4 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

zuchinibut
02/20/2006

Possession of pornography 1

I think that it is absolutely fine for an adult to possess or view pornography. Of course this rating is assuming that the pornography doesn't involve animals, children, or unwilling participants.

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

10 reviews!     « Previous  |  Page    of  1  |  Next »

view stats
1.40
average based on 10 ratings
View the full list:
Amazon Shopping
$48.46