| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | Victor83 (35)
07/14/2007 | Great acting, great casting, great directing, awesome story...probably the best movie ever produced.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | GenghisTheHun (168)
06/04/2007 | This is o.k. but I hate the flashbacks that are typical for late 1930's and 1940's movies. Also the Commie script writers got their licks in with the Spanish Civil War comments--of course Bogart was an old lefto so he probably relished in it.
Ingrid is so beautiful that I probably should rate this higher. This flick really doesn't wear that well for me.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | ma duron (62)
06/20/2006 | The ultimate Hollywood movie in all meaningful departments, bar none.
(4 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jamestkirk (23)
03/11/2006 | Rates among the top five films of all time.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | jaywilton (26)
03/10/2006 | For my own taste,this is the earliest Oscar winner that I would call timeless(including Gone With The Wind)-and incidently,this is a classic with no objectional language that hasn't been surpassed and rarely competed with.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | FranksWildYears (48)
03/09/2006 | A great script and career making performances for Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman (maybe Notorious was a match) and Claude Raines. Supporting cast was excellent, and Michael Cutiz, a director of routine swashbucklers comes through as a solid storyteller. Thank God Ronald Regan was never cast in the lead, even if it is an urban legend that he was ever considered for it.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Drummond (54)
03/09/2006 | Guess I had it wrong. I thought Casablanca was in 42.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-7 OF 7 | View All |
