| REVIEWER | RATING & REVIEW |
 | VirileVagabond (32)
09/14/2006 | Contrary to some of the prior comments, I like this new feature for several reasons. First, while I concur that the names and pics do add some clutter, but the value added is worth it to me and I've gotten to the point that I recognize pics more than names. This feature is especially helpful in determining any recent activity on my weblists now that the link to the most recent comments on those lists is now gone for the time being. As another comment noted, those members listed appear to be those who simply rated last rather those who rated the most items. Perhaps two separate listings to show both should be considered.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | PlanetaryGear (52)
05/07/2006 | As it is right now, it seems like a useless feature - and what's with the old user-pics? This feature might have bit more merit if it also showed those who rate without commenting as well - that would really be interesting...
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Vudija (92)
04/20/2006 | The concept is great, but the layout of it takes up so much room on each page. I believe Blue mentioned that it might be better if it were simply a list of usernames, rather than adding in that users pictures to it.
(1 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | BlueOrchid (41)
04/20/2006 | Rather than having the profile pictures in the "people most interested in this topic" they should just have a list.
There is too much on the page and it's really a distraction.
(2 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | frogio (47)
04/19/2006 | I guess I'm only going to be talking to myself, then. Now I all have to do is learn a way to troll myself and it'll be like there has been no redesign at all.
(3 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | magellan (153)
04/18/2006 | I really like the idea as a way to find folks who share interests, but the execution isn't there yet. It's pulling photos from god knows where, and the alignment looks off.
(6 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Djahuti (54)
04/18/2006 | I don't see why this is necessary.It was easy enough to tell who was interested in what just by browsing the reviews.Why waste space and "bits/bytes" with pictures of who's reviewing what?
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | zuchinibut (36)
04/18/2006 | I don't disagree with the idea for this change, but I think that this and other changes amount to clutter. Too much stuff on one page is distracting.
(5 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
 | Jed1000 (72)
04/18/2006 | A bit of a misnomer, really. It more correctly indicates who last reviewed the item rather than indicating a certain level of interest. And I don't see the point of the photo ID being included.
(8 voted this helpful, 0 funny and 0 agree) |
| 1-9 OF 9 | View All |
