coldd

While bigger isn't always better, I don't understand some of the complaints in the prior comments. Certainly the bigger stars are primarily a cosmetic change, but no matter how detailed the review each one boils down to the numbered star rating. Plus, some people only rate sans comment, so the stars are really all those members are interested in. Perhaps this was how it worked prior to the redesign, but I do like how we can now simply click the star rather than using the drop-down list.

Im sorry, but Im not a big fan of the new stars. They are too faint and you can sometimes see the date right on top of the stars which makes it harder to see how many there are. But there is an elegance to it that the old stars didnt have. Bring back the old, they were easier to see.

Totally unecessary, but I like the audacity of it, so a five it is.

I'm glad they are bigger, along with the font, but it's far easier to see the small stars than it was to see the small font...so...why did the stars have to be SO big?

They're too cute-sy and make rate it all look like it was attacked by sticker mongering kindergarteners.

Awful. Why didn't you just go whole hog and make them smiley faces or Hello Kittys???

Bigger is not always better.

Yeah, they're big. Deal with it :)

i think it gives it a fun feel to it. keep 'em.

. . . yikes . . . they could really stand to be deflated a bit. Er. Actually, a LOT.

It's like I'm back in kindergarten. . .AaBbCcDdEeFfGgHh and so on. . .

They're huge!