As with the new favicon, I suppose that the new logo is a nice little aesthetic improvement, but it isn't earth shattering, it doesn't really improve the functioning of the site in any way, and I don't even remember the old one (assuming there was an old one). I'll also speculate that the logo serves as both a status symbol and a matter of pride for the RIA developers, which is fair enough. Lastly, (as I stated before with the favicon) I really hope that not too many resources were invested in this change, as so many more practical improvements need to be made.

Its not bad, in fact it is good. It is simple yet brings my attention. It isnt much different from the old logo though. Just a different colour. Instead of been black and orange, it is now orange.

An inconsequetial change, but it is one of the few cosmetic changes, other than the user-pics, that is more aesthetically pleasing.

I don't dislike it, but I never really paid much attention to the logo we had before.

It's nice although I never really noticed it to begin with.

I dunno, it looks so "corporate" to me. My company logo is bad ass compaired to that one.

I like it and if it helps promote the site, then it was a good move.

Maybe now people will start rating it all instead of rating it some.

"If I'm being honest here...", better than the old but not noticeable. Too straight and orderly. Easily lost.

I like it, but I don't love it.

The logo is fine, but it would be better if it stood out more on the page.

Umm . . . actually, I didn't even notice it. There's a lot of other stuff going on on the site that it didn't stand out. It's not that it's a good or bad thing, it just wasn't as big of a change as . . . well, the rest of the site. Pretty neutral.