Username: Password:
Welcome! Please Sign In or Register
Item added by garjen55. Added on 06/29/2006
RSS Icon

10 Reviews

SuziQueue
08/07/2009

Wham! 3

talented but cringeworthy

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

MapleRock
05/26/2008

Wham! 2

Wham has a better chance of getting laid in a men's room than getting into the hall.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 1 Agree / 0 Disagree

chrismin2003
03/13/2008

Wham! 1

Wake me up before . . . they even get a sniff at the RRHoF! ! ! !

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

CanadaSucks
10/29/2007

Wham! 1

That this group earned real money is one of the strangest mysteries in the music world. . .

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

FranksWildYear s
10/29/2007

Wham! 1

Puh'leeeez! Silly teen pop. George Michael developed into a decent singer and occasionally fine songwriter after the break-up of Wham, but there is nothing to be celebrated about the easy likeability of his first go around on the top of the pops.

Join to vote! 0 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

marto
02/02/2007

Wham! 5

yeah

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 1 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

kolby1973
01/18/2007

Wham! 3

I don't necessarily think WHAM should be in the Hall of Fame, but George Michael in his solo career definately should be. He has many, many hits under his record and is totally deserving of it.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

Limpin' Trenchfoot
11/17/2006

Wham! 1

As a reminder of what camp 80s pop was all about - very gay choreography, gay hairstyles (how anyone was surprised when GM came out) - yes. As having made a lasting impact on the music scene..no way Jose. Not in a trillion years.

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

southparker9
07/16/2006

Wham! 1

Not much of an impact group. Left no mark on rock other than George Michael. I don't see them worthy of the question.

Join to vote! 1 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

djdavem
06/30/2006

Wham! 3

Sure, why not. But in a few years I'd give George Michael (solo) more serious consideration.

Join to vote! 2 Helpful / 0 Funny / 0 Agree / 0 Disagree

10 reviews!     « Previous  |  Page    of  1  |  Next »

view stats
2.51
average based on 51 ratings