MICHAEL R. BLOOD

How is this guy even employed? I just read a very biased 'news' piece by him and was completely incredulous. That prompted a google search, and here I land. Unbelievable... and I'm a registered democrat!

5 STARS = "VERY BIASED" (does NOT equate to "very good", quite the opposite)Blood's December 21, 2007 article on Rudolph Giuliani is a sad piece of journalism.  It is pure propaganda to achieve political goals.  While it read like an editorial piece, it apparently was published as a report deemed to be newsworthy. The essay is clearly an attempt to cloud Giuliani's reputation just before the Iowa primaries. In it, Blood makes wide, loose, and disconnected allegations. In writing"The mayor made famous _ and very wealthy _ in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks has long described his City Hall as an open book."he indicates that Giuliani was made rich after 9/11, insinuating that Giuliani financially benefitted from the horrific attacks on his city.  He offers no support of this inflammatory statement, and ignores the fact that shortly after the attacks Giuliani completed his final term and reentered the private sector where his income and income potentials were no longer fixed.Bl... Read more

Biased, leftist operative masquerading as an AP reporter. Guiliani piece a vicious hatchet job. Blood's writing is emblematic of the AP's low journalistic standards.