irishgit 11/03/2008
Only if I get to write them. 1. Any user name that includes anything but letters and numbers gets the user a minor electric shock every five reviews, and a pre-frontal lobotomy after 30. 2. Reviewers who have 90 per cent or more of their reviews on the subject of Britney Spears, American Idol, or any other pop culture crap are limited to 15 minutes on site per month. 3. Dog food reviewers must post webcam videos of themselves sampling the product. 4. Grizzdip reviewers are prohibited from item 3. 5. Purchase of a webcam by Christophino will cause the site to crash.
Helpful
Funny
Agree
Disagree
louiethe20th 11/02/2008
The site is pretty well self governed and Mag does a pretty adequate job when he needs to step in, but I feel this Christophino is way over the top with the excessive sex posts. I feel it cheapens and hampers the integrity of the site. RIA is far different than most sites without the curse words every 2 words and the childish nonsense! I hate to see it begin down this road.
Victor83 11/02/2008
If you think RIA is not well moderated, try having an honest, open exchange of ideas in other forums on the net.
CanadaSucks 11/02/2008
. . .remember kids, I never wanted the avatars in the first place. Careful what you wish for. (Want opinions? Ahs got 'em!)
lmorovan 05/04/2008
It has enough rules already. What it needs is more impartiality.
abichara 09/27/2007
I in general don't have a lot of complaints about how RIA is managed. Frankly, the owners of the site can do it however way they want to. Sure, it's right that users can complain to the admin. about problems, but they can do what they want. I have only one problem though: whenever someone leaves the site, I believe that their weblists should not disappear off too with them. Many of us over time have left comments on lists that have been lost. I estimate that I've lost over time about 500 total ratings from weblists from users that have decided to leave the site. That isn't right in my view. Certainly anyboby can leave when they want, but the weblists should remain as property of the site. Users can make them, but only with the caveat that they know that they can't be deleted when you leave the site. Its only fair that users should know that their ratings won't be deleted on a whim.
LadyJesusFan77 7 09/24/2007
I agree with Kamylienne. I think people could be a little more mature about the way things are handled.
kamylienne 09/24/2007
Hell if I know. I think people should mind themselves and behave like reasonable people rather than require policing by some website, but that's just me. Maybe that's just asking an awful lot.
8 reviews! « Previous | Page of 1 | Next »
Sort by Newest Oldest Most helpful Least helpful Highest rated Lowest rated